THE END OF THE PAINTING
it is not that serious as the phrase "the end of the world"
but it sounds like that..
To compare the End of a painting with the End of the world.. well, thoughts about disasters are not counting. This kind of an End, after the action of Painting, statistically happens much more often than the "global one" with the world. (What???)
The End of the Painting is like... The end of a painting process. When the painting is Finished - it is a result. Most of the actions lead to the result, however, to the End. Finish line, End, Stop of the action, no more painting, that's it, it's finished, the End. The painting is finished. That phrase "It's not important to win, participating is what matters" - may be important for the viewer, who did not participate in the painting process - so, he sees only the End, the Finished painting. Is it fair?
The End in this case, goes for the visual prize, but the painting itself is just a bait. The bait for curiosity - what happened? How did it happen? how did it go?
The viewer sees the painting for the first time, however, for the artist this finished painting hung on the wall means The End. The End of the process, the end of a creation, action - and this is all because the artist had participated in his own process, ha ha.. philosophy...
For the viewer this finished painting "End" is the Beginning! (Now WHAT????)
Comparing this painting with a movie or a book.... NOOOO, could that be like watching only the last scene, or reading only the last chapter??
Maybe this is too far in to the forest, but I think it is not fair anyway, because the end is taken out of the context without the whole picture.
it is not that serious as the phrase "the end of the world"
but it sounds like that..
To compare the End of a painting with the End of the world.. well, thoughts about disasters are not counting. This kind of an End, after the action of Painting, statistically happens much more often than the "global one" with the world. (What???)
The End of the Painting is like... The end of a painting process. When the painting is Finished - it is a result. Most of the actions lead to the result, however, to the End. Finish line, End, Stop of the action, no more painting, that's it, it's finished, the End. The painting is finished. That phrase "It's not important to win, participating is what matters" - may be important for the viewer, who did not participate in the painting process - so, he sees only the End, the Finished painting. Is it fair?
The End in this case, goes for the visual prize, but the painting itself is just a bait. The bait for curiosity - what happened? How did it happen? how did it go?
The viewer sees the painting for the first time, however, for the artist this finished painting hung on the wall means The End. The End of the process, the end of a creation, action - and this is all because the artist had participated in his own process, ha ha.. philosophy...
For the viewer this finished painting "End" is the Beginning! (Now WHAT????)
Comparing this painting with a movie or a book.... NOOOO, could that be like watching only the last scene, or reading only the last chapter??
Maybe this is too far in to the forest, but I think it is not fair anyway, because the end is taken out of the context without the whole picture.